Assessing Research in Employment Figures and Studies Part Two
This article is part two of our research into business studies and findings. Kevin Hindle does less citation of past work and more of a job providing a framework for understands his motivations and ideas for breaking down information during a list of “Five General Principles of Converting Research Findings into Action Guidelines” (Hindle, 3).
This section of nearly a full page proposes methods of aggregating content and turn findings in conclusions. This structural approach is almost a solution to the earlier lack of academic research due to the lack of motivation by offering a way of finding new principles. All four articles group individual separations of ideas and group their citations.
When it comes to a more objective approach to solely grouping information from other sources I find Ramona Heck’s work to be a stereotypical approach filled with many citations. In a section of conceptualizations of entrepreneurship there are more than two dozen individual findings and frameworks (Heck, 5). Her detailed organization makes it easy to see points of distinctions of subject matter.
Heck’s articles also provide a healthy amount of data from University institutions in the United States and worldwide. Brian Williams also uses research from France, Spain, Canada, and New Zealand for a deeper field of research. Heck models subsystems and communication patterns to composite and group data when necessary (7). Heck puts forth evidence before making assertions, and makes them sparingly. This is strength in the work of this piece.
On the side of weakness I have to call into account some of the sources used by Brian Williams that are dated from 1996 and similarly aged work. There is even some ironic judgment form this article that journalists should be “cognicent” of the relevance of their work (10). The relevance of older material must be called into question and makes the rest of article somewhat suspect as well. This seems to be one of the few exceptions to the rule of recent work citing that is followed by the other three sources.
Personally it seems that each refereed journal that was cited here was defined by the writer’s background and interpretation of the issue and methodology deemed proper. This is difficult to gear away from as a write because it can be hard to keep yourself off the page when you spend extended amounts of time focusing on a particular subject. It is natural to begin to process data and theories even if you are not trying to. As a result of this it is clear to see how research and numbers can be turned away from objective results and towards a more processed finished product.
Business Communication and Diversity in the Workplace: A Guest Editorial
Journal article by Gail Fann Thomas; The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 33, 1996
Emerging Paths of Family Entrepreneurship Research
Journal article by Ramona K.Z. Heck, Frank Hoy, Panikkos Z. Poutziouris, Lloyd P. Steier; Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 46, 2008
Hindle, Kevin. Robert B. Anderson , Brian Gibson. From What We Know to How We Use It: Five Principles for Turning Entrepreneurship Research into Practitioner Action Guidelines.
Williams, Brian and Graeme Wines .The First 10 Years of Accounting History as an International Refereed Journal: 1996-2005